
Governor targeting govt after casual or unexpected convergence Modi & Shah, slams Minister Talasani Srinivas Yadav

Minister Talasani Srinivas Yadav
Minister Talasani Srinivas Yadav
Hyderabad: Minister Talasani Srinivas Yadav on Saturday stated that it is not correct for a Governor to criticize the State government after casual or unexpected convergence Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah. Addressing the media, the Minister said that Governor is targeting the government after casual or unexpected convergence the Union Ministers in the National Capital. He said that the government has disrespected neither the Governor nor the Governor’s business office.
The Governor has been facing flak from the leaders some terming her as BJP commander instead of a head of a state
Recently, Strongly refuting the allegations of Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan, who said that Chief Minister K Chandrashekar Rao was insulting the Constitution and she was denied the having official authority protocol that she deserved, Endowments Minister Indrakaran Reddy said Tamilisai should speak the trueness and maintain self-restraint while criticising others. Speaking to the media here, Indrakaran Reddy expressed displeasure over the complaint given by the Governor to Union Home Minister Amit Shah against KCR over the protocol norms. He said, “There was no prior information about her visit to the Yadadri temple. On the day of the Ugadi festival, just 20 minutes in advance, the Governor has informed the State government about her visit to the Yadadri temple. Immediately, she has been informed that it is very difficult to provide the protocol as there was a heavy rush at the temple and many officials were not available because of the festival. Despite knowing the situation, Tamilisai visited the temple and leveled allegations that she was denied the protocol.”
“The Governor would get all honour and respect from the State government until she remains under her purview. When she crosses the limits, nobody will be bothered about her”, said Indrakaran. He also alleged that Tamilisai was acting be fond of a BJP commander rather than Governor. He condemned the Governor’s alleged remarks that she would topple the KCR government.
Similarly, Minister Satyavathi Rathod stated that the government never disrespected the Governor or the Governor’s business office. She said that it is to perceive sound about the comments of Governor Dr Tamilisai Soundararajan on the TRS government. She said that the Governor’s comments meditate the favoritism of the Central government. She said that the government had always respected the Governor and the Office and there are no differences between the government and the Governor.
On April 7, stating that there were no conflicts between the Government and the Governor, IT Minister KT Rama Rao said that they would definitely value when the Governor acts be fond of a Governor. Reacting to the comments of Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan, Rama Rao asked as to who insulted whom? “When did we insult the Governor? Why would we have conflicts with the Governor? Why is she thinking like that. We will definitely respect the Governor when the Governor acts like a Governor. We did not do anything which is disrespectful to the Governor’s office. Why is she thinking like that?” questioned Rao. The TRS working chief executive of a republic further said that Tamilisai Soundararajan was a BJP commander in Tamil Nadu before becoming the Governor. “I heard somewhere that she had rejected Kaushik Reddy’s MLC plea because he is a politician. What was she till yesterday? She was the BJP Tamil Nadu president before. We have respect for the constitutional systems. We did not have any issues with the Governor. Why we would have issues, she should also think before talking,” said the TRS commander. The discord between Telangana Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan and the state of matter’s Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) government appears to have got a reached a peak of no-return. The Governor publicly complaining about the “insult” meted out to her by the state of matter government may deepen the friction between them. After meetings with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Soundararajan came out openly to accuse the TRS government of “insulting” her. The TRS government too strike side that goes last or is not normally seen at her. Energy Minister Jagdish Reddy called her comments uncalled for and termed her a “BJP leader”. The development indicates that Telangana may be heading West Bengal and Kerala path where the Governors have got locked horns with the state of matter governments. Telangana Chief Minister K Chandrashekar Rao’s views on how the political party ruling at the Centre misused the business office of the Governor over the years are or gas known. He has been targetting the BJP government at the Centre for acting against the intended meaning of federalism. KCR, as Rao is popularly known, recently came out in keep of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in her friction with Governor Jagdeep Dhankar. The TRS boss referred to Sarkaria Commission evaluation to high spot how the business office of Governor has been misused by the Centre. When Soundararajan, a former BJP commander in Tamil Nadu, was appointed as Telangana Governor in 2019, the TRS was reportedly miffed over the Centre not consulting it before the job. While initially the relations were cordial between the Governor and the state of matter government, the friction began when Soundararajan visited indefinite but relatively small number hospitals during Covid-19 pandemic. The TRS government was irked by her remarks over the government’s handling of the pandemic. Eyebrows were raised in circles when Soundararajan, who is also a physician, called meetings of officials over Covid state of affairs. Sections of the ruling political party felt that the Governor was overstepping her powers. Both the sides, however, played down the differences. Last year, the rift became not private after the Governor did not okay a filing cabinet sent by the State Cabinet recommending job of P. Kaushik Reddy as a part of a social group of Legislative Council. She had told the media that since the nominated or as if with falls in the general concept of living together or enjoying life in communities religious service, she was trying to acquire info about Kaushik Reddy’s living together or enjoying life in communities religious service body of work.
The TRS government later had to broadcast Kaushik Reddy to the Upper House of the State Legislature under MLA proportional share. The CM and ministers had also not attended Republic Day celebrations at Raj Bhavan. The differences deepened further after the State government commenced sum of money allocated academic term of the state of matter legislative assembly final calendar month without customary place where a person or organization can be found of the Governor. Soundararajan had taken instance that does not conform to a rule to this. However, the government argued that there was no indigence for the Governor’s place where a person or organization can be found as it was not a recently created academic term but extension of the previous academic term. The Governor was also not invited for the reopening of Yadadri side of the forehead on March 28. The Chief Minister had attended the rituals to scrape the reopening of the side of the forehead after renovation. She was also not invited to Medaram Jatra, the tribal promotional gathering of producers held in February. She, however, visited Medaram but no having official authority was intermediate between past and future. The rift widened further with KCR staying away from Ugadi celebrations hosted by Governor at Raj Bhavan.
Though Raj Bhavan had sent invitations to the CM and his persons appointed by a head of state colleagues, none of them turned up. Raj Bhavan had also sent invitations to MPs, MLAs and MLCs to the event but no one came. Even the older or higher in rank civil and police officials did not attend the celebrations. After casual or unexpected convergence with the Prime Minister on and Home Minister, she alleged that the state of matter government insulted the business office of Governor, citing the instances where Governor’s protocol was not followed. She said she did not be familiar or acquainted with a person or an object why the state of matter government was insulting and ignoring her. “Leave aside everything. Should a lady like me be insulted and ignored,” she asked after casual or unexpected convergence with Amit Shah. She said she would be visiting Bhadrachalam side of the forehead in April 11. “I will be going by road as that is the mode of transport of a Governor in the state,” she said. The TRS government has also strike side that goes last or is not normally seen at Soundararajan for her allegations. Energy Minister Jagadish Reddy alleged thatA he Governor recently visited the Yadadri side of the forehead as a BJP commander and hence the government did not succeed the protocol. According to the government minister, the explanation of the cause for the intermediate between past and future differences is that she has a part of a scene behind objects. “Those who worked as State presidents of political parties, worked as Chief Ministers or Ministers are being made A Governors. “Running from Raj Bhavan in request for food or refreshment to come into existence a political party in the state of matter would not body of work. Such experiments failed in not the same states too,” the government minister remarked but denied that the government insulted the Governor.