Let there be a way of doing something in the madness too!

The calendar week from April 16 to 23 has once again witnessed a naked move in a pattern to music of communal frenzy in some parts of the country. After incidents of assault on the Hanuman Janmotsav procession in Jahangirpuri locality in Delhi and alike incidents in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan unlike narratives have got been churned out by both the Hindu as oil as Muslim leaders. The media has been abuzz with such stories most of which are senseless or laughable.

A post-mortem of these ghastly incidents invariably leads to a finish that divisible by two after snatching some 30 per cent of Bharat, the self-proclaimed smaller in number called Muslims nonmoving thinks that it is its birth right hand side to defy the solemn provisions of the Constitution which in most unequivocal terms guarantees every member of a state equality, condition of being free of social movement, saying and religion and protecting someone or something of jurisprudence against any ravishment on the and material possession. This process of perceiving of Muslims by and big undoubtedly stems from the Quaranic teachings in Madrasas and at homes which makes an not exceptional Muslim a hard-core fanatic who considers that folks from not the same faiths are ‘Kafirs’ and therefore, be operating or functioning after their , whether on a slightest provocation or no provocation at all. According to such malefactor elements, all rights are granted by the Constitution and not the same statues to Muslims only and not the same than Muslims have got no rights whatsoever. This intolerance has been the part of plant causal agent of uninterrupted strife between the fanatic Muslims. who enjoy vigorous or tacit livelihood from the vested interests, and the law-abiding humble Hindu absolute majority.

And a sort of piece of machinery was developed by the ruling pro-Muslim governments and communal Muslim elements whereby the former were to acquire a cake of vote-bank in act of returning to a prior location of concessions, freebies, subsidies under the garb of the social welfare of minorities. This quid pro quo state of affairs also allowed the fanatics to enjoy to excess in brow-beating, assaulting, insulting and divisible by two rioting against the absolute majority Hindu residential district. It was owed to this unwritten placement that killings of clean-handed Hindus , burning their properties and heinous offences, such as violate, kidnapping , extortion, were allowed to die mostly unpunished.

But the state of affairs has changed after 2014 with the passing of the baton of world power from the so-called lay parties to the patriot parties, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The Internet results are now seeable. The dormant and respecting others Hindu has and aware of his rights. He too, has begun paying rear the Muslim fanatic elements in the same money. Because of the relating to principles of right and wrong and livelihood extended by the government of the solar day, undoubtedly the present-day Hindu has fearless and daring and fearless. Therefore, in self- defence and in request for food or refreshment to shield from danger his fellowmen and material possession, today’s Hindu valiantly fights against the elements. Indeed, this has a causal agent of large in size feeling of sympathy for the fanatic elements who undergo an emotional sensation that the days of their hegemony have got come to an ending.

However, in all fairness, it must be conceded that such an eye-for-eye state of affairs should not be allowed to prolong for of relatively great duration by the government. The reply of the violence-infested State governments is certainly not praise-worthy though it may be applauded by the listeners in a art gallery. The government at the Centre and in unlike States has the initial and the foremost work that you are obliged to perform to choose preventive measures. With a large police strength at their authoritative instruction, the respective governments ought to have got foreseen the state of affairs and taken preventive measures. Further, in the vigil over a corpse of the violence and riots, the role of bulldozers is illogical, if not , to tell the least. Again, the rationale handed out by authorities for role of bulldozers is that the demolished constructions were without approval to do something and therefore, , can hardly be digested by a individual with sensible prudence, considering the timings of such demolitions. The crux of the story is: when our ruling parties testament memorize to spill hypocrisy and honor the testament of the absolute majority? In such an explosive state of affairs, instead of following the itinerary of declaring the country as a Hindu Rashtra and striping off the rights of all anti-national elements, the instant response revealing a person’s feelings or attitude of bulldozing buildings of criminals is strictly not a suitable way of acting or behaving to resolve the burning issues.

SC on ad-hoc employees

Reiterating its judgments in Rattanlal & others Vs State of Haryana and Hargurpratap Singh Vs State of Punjab and others, a long seat comprising Justice L Nageswara Rao and Justice BR Gavai said : ” It is a settled principle of law that an ad- hoc employee cannot be replaced by another ad-hoc employee and he can be replaced only by another candidate who is regularly appointed by following a regular procedure prescribed.”

The judicature, however, rejected the plea of the appellants for defrayal of salaries, as per UGC give money in exchange for goods or services scales, saying the advertisement describing the appellants as invitee teachers had clarified that they would be paid an honorarium at the pace of Rs.1,000 per minutes. The legal verdict was delivered in an challenge a decision titled: Manish Gupta and another Vs Jana Bhagidari Samiti and others.

Accused may examine complainant in S.138 A oEXAMINE COMPLAINANT IN S.138 A NI display case

Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan of the Madurai long seat of Madras High Court while dealing with a malefactor revision petition in SMD Mohamed Abdul Khader Vs Muniswari, relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Tedhi Singh Vs Narayan Dass Mahant (2022) in which the apex judicature had held that when the accused takes specific put up with that the complainant had no informant of to loan such a large amount, the accused can very oil establish the same by cross-examination, witnesses and cloth. Setting aside the request for food or refreshment of a frown judicature, he allowed an accused under Section 138 A of the Negotiable Instruments Act to examine complainant’s incline of witnesses.

Dealing with a malefactor revision petition in SMD Mohamed Abdul Khader Vs Muniswari, the judicature relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Tedhi Singh Vs Narayan Dass Mahant (2022) in which the apex judicature had held that when the accused takes specific put up with that the complainant had no informant of to loan such a large amount, the accused can very oil establish the same by cross-examination, witnesses and cloth.

SUMMER VACATION FOR TS COURTS

All the courts of the Civil Judges (Junior Division) on civil incline and Civil Judge (Junior Division) of the City Civil Courts including Civil Judges functioning as Rent Controllers testament be unopen for the summertime vacation from May 2 to June 3 (Both days inclusive), according to an having official authority notification. Similarly, for all the courts of the Civil Judges of the City Civil Courts the interval taken to complete one cycle of summertime vacation shall be from May 10 to June 3.