Manikonda public body cocks a snook at HMDA orders

Manikonda: In the lack of correct control in between the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA) as well as the Ranga Reddy districts, appeals pertaining to infringements on lakes, unsanctioned as well as questioned designs as well as prohibited buildings continue to be existing unheard for a long period of time.

Be it a HMDA informed Yerra Kunta Cheruvu in Jalpally, which has virtually vanished as a result of brazen degree of infringements or unsanctioned designs as well as prohibited buildings in Manikonda town, every little thing provided a deep understanding right into a lacklustre disagreement redressal system of the public establishments such as HMDA as well as the Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) creating challenges for the people.

Despite guidelines being released from HMDA versus unsanctioned designs as well as buildings, the Manikonda town is taking it gently leading to support of culprits as well as land sharks that are discovered bring their tasks with complete immunity.

This emerged just recently when a letter was discovered existing un-attended with the Municipal workplace pertaining to guidelines from HMDA to act versus contested design in Sy.No88 of Neknampur town of Gandipet Mandal under Manikonda town.

Only last year the HMDA passed an interaction via letter No.7676/ MP2/H/1999 dated October 8, 2021 to the Commissioner Municipal Council Manikonda asking him not to release any type of structure authorization in Sy.No 88 of Neknampur town in Gandipet Mandal till query right into the contested design surfaces.

However, regardless of understanding that the earlier order was tossed to the wind as building on contested design discovered relocating regularly, the HMDA passed 2nd comparable interaction on June 2022 once again via a letterNo 7676/MP2/H/ 1999 dated November 6, 2022 asking the commissioner not to enable building task in the contested design in Sy.No88 in conformity to the Court order under W.P.No 17940/2020, dated October 19, 2020.

The urbane body additionally advised the community commissioner to take ideal activity under area 23( 2) of HMDA Act 2008 as well as submit a conformity record within 15 days from the day of invoice of the letter for additional activity in the issue. However, it was discovered that no activity was taken yet by theMunicipal Council

“All the orders issued by the Court and the HMDA regarding steps to prevent construction on disputed layout spreads over an area of 2.27 acres of land in Sy.No.88 of Neknampur Village in Gandipet Mandal was thrown to the air. The construction activities are relentlessly moving on round the clock under the nose of Manikonda municipality while the officials from both HMDA and the municipality found are busy in playing blame games,” rued Mohd Zahed Hussain, the plaintiff.

When gotten in touch with, K Phalgun Kumar, the Commissioner Municipal Council Manikonda stated, “We are not approving permissions in Sy.No.88 of Neknampur Village under Gandipet Mandal ever since we came to know about the dispute over the layout.

However, the Town Planning Officer of Manikonda Municipal Council G Rakesh, who visited the area to inspect the disputed site lashed out at HMDA for approving the layout first and now asking the Municipal officials to stop the construction activities.

“The development strategy in the contested design was authorized by the HMDA itself as well as the authority ought to terminate it initially prior to asking us to oversee the tasks. If the strategy was authorized by the HMDA, that are we to watch on the tasks over the questioned website constantly,” rued the authorities.

.