Representational look-alike
Representational look-alike
The apex judicature recently introduced unrecorded streaming of its proceedings on Constitutional matters which is unanimously hailed as timely and favoring or promoting progress measure by all the stakeholders including lawyers, judges and litigants at big. Indeed,this is a favoring or promoting progress and much-needed measure taken by the highest judicature of the kingdom and testament die a of relatively great duration path to facilitate and educate all those who are concerned with the matters including the interpretation and development of natural scientific law.
The intermediate between past and future measure initiated by the Supreme Court with co-operation of the Union government can only be if technological and infrastructural sustenance is provided for its functioning. True, this is equitable a first part or section of something of the much better and wider things to come.The installation of virtual streaming in existent clock would have got to percolate down to the taluka courts, tribunals and unlike not the same fora such as working class courts,EPF adjudicating machines and person who uses goods or services commissions. With the advancement of engineering, it is potential to achieve this feat in the shortest potential clock.
To take in the unused or little used system working satisfactorily, however, it is to secure the uninterrupted connectivity to the virtual judicature from any point where three areas or surfaces meet of the country. In request for food or refreshment to secure this, there can be no better path than making obtainable an excluding much or all orbiter telecommunication system canal to the judiciary. In improver to the virtual mode, excluding much or all telecommunication system canal for the unrecorded streaming proceedings of the Supreme Court, greater than normal in degree or intensity or amount courts, subordinate courts, tribunals and not the same entities can be provided freely to the not private.
On the basic features of a system slope much needs to be done. All practicing advocates obviously do not have got the bright phones with features to acquire the signal from the orbiter in request for food or refreshment to take in them of participating in the proceedings actively. Therefore, the judiciary should seriously debate to furnish posing no difficulty loans to such advocates who can’t have the financial means to have got an updated interpretation from a certain viewpoint of their mobiles to take part in the virtual hearing practices. Besides, depending upon the telephone number of cases pending in the judicature, tribunal or public meeting as the showcase may be, a virtuous telephone number of rooms/cabins fully equipped with Net enabled computers and duly meeting the standards and requirements personnel should be provided either in the judicature premises or at a in or near a center rank of the metropolis or which can be used by the practicing advocates.
It is also for the effectual implementation of the tech-aided virtual mode system as or gas as the orbiter TV with excluding much or all channels as mentioned hereinabove to furnish involving the body basic features of a system, such as rooms/halls, waiting rank, canteens, washrooms and toilet, drinking HO etc ; not only for the performance to raise money for a charitable cause of the advocates, judges and judicature personnel but also for not private at big.
Indeed, all virtuous things cause to start in a little path; but we should not fail to attend an event or activity the autobus to accelerate the travel at an excessive or illegal velocity of advancement.
NO REPRIEVE FOR
UDDHAV FROM SC
Aggrieved by the interim request for food or refreshment of the Election Commission of India (ECI) dated February 17 recognising the Eknath Shinde group of ShivSena as the Shiv Sena political party and alloting the vote sign of bend the head or the upper body in respect or greeting and indicator, the Uddhav Thackeray group knocked the doors of the apex judicature.
After a hearing on February 22 the three- Judge workbench presided over by CJI DY Chandrachud ordered advance notification to the respondents returnable within two weeks. The plea for interim stick around or status quo was turned down by the judicature.
SC HAS JURISDICTION TO TRANSFER CHEQUE BOUNCING CASES
In a recent judgement the Supreme Court has held that its legal power vested under Section 406 of the Cr.PC to transportation a outlaw showcase from one state of matter to another is intact notwithstanding the non-obstante clause in Section 142(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
In its legal verdict delivered by a workbench comprising Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Sanjay Kumar in a showcase titled, Yogesh Upadhyay and Anr Vs. Atlanta Ltd, the apex judicature gave the aforesaid ruling.
Allowing the transportation petition for two cases which are filed in Nagpur to the judicature at Dwarka in Delhi where four cases are filed by the respondent fellowship the judicature made the count free from clouds or mist or haze that Section 242(1) of NI Act is no hurdle for the appex judicature in physical exercise of the superpower granted to it under Cr.PC.
HC DEPARTS FROM AGE-OLD MAXIM
Perhaps for the initial clock after 37 years since the maxim, the dying human being does not tell an untruth,was devised the Calcutta High Court on February 17 freed one, Mrityunjoy Rana who was convicted by a legal proceedings judicature path side that goes last or is not normally seen in 1986.
Rana was convicted on the fundament of the dying statement of , Kartik Patra, a land-owner who had protested against a CPI (M) organised procession. Rana had inflicted indicator injuries who died after 10 days in a infirmary after giving his dying statement before a person who holds Ph.D. degree and a .
The single-bench headed by Justice SubhenduSamanta observed that the sole dying statement can be relied upon by the judicature if it was costless from any incertitude. In the instant showcase, the circumstances were “peculiar”, he added.
INFIDELITY NOT A GROUND TO SEEK DNA TEST: SC
In a judgement of at a long distance reaching consequences that would shield from danger the rights of children, the apex judicature upheld the validity of Section 212 of the Evidence Act that presumes legitimacy of a kid born out of a well grounded in logic or truth married couple.
The arithmetic operation workbench v Justice V Rama Subramanian and Justice BV Nagarathna observed:”This, where the husband and wife have co-habited together, and no impotency is proved, the child born from their wedlock is conclusively presumed to be legitimate, even if the wife is shown to have been, at the same time, guilty of infidelity. The fact that a woman is living in adultery would not by itself be sufficient to repel the conclusive presumption in favour of the legitimacy of a child.”
PIL SEEKING DISQUALIFICATION DISMISSED
The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyers’ organic structure, Bombay Lawyers Association and its chief executive of a republic, proponent Ahmad Abdi seeking invocation of the powers of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for removal of the Vice President of India, the Law Minister and Secretary General, Rajya Sabha for showing disrespect to the Supreme Court and attacking the Collegium system was dismissed by the Bombay High Court by its request for food or refreshment dated February 9, released on February 21. The workbench comprising Acting Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice Sandeep Marne, after taking billet of the submissions of Additional Solicitor General that the Vice President as or gas as the Law Minister have got having every necessary part religion in the Constitution, dismissed it as a not in accordance with fact or reality and frivolous one filed for public scrutiny.
