Sunday, July 13, 2025
More
    HomeTelanganaControversy Over Transparency in ICDS Mobile Tender

    Controversy Over Transparency in ICDS Mobile Tender

    Related stories

    Ujjaini Mahankali Bonalu starts in Secunderabad, draws many devotees

    The Ujjaini Mahankali Ammavari Bonalu festival began today with...

    Join PM Modi’s 2047 Vision for a Developed India says Kishan

    Hyderabad: G Kishan Reddy, the Union Minister for Coal...

    Head of PM’s Economic Advisory Council Meets CM Revanth Reddy

    S. Mahendra Dev, head of the Prime Minister's Economic...
    -Advertisement-

    Hyderabad: The Telangana Women and Child Welfare Department is facing scrutiny over a tender for mobile phones meant for Anganwadi supervisors under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS).

    The Central Government had advised states to provide smartphones for this purpose. Many states followed a fair tender process, but Telangana’s method is questionable. Sources from ICDS revealed complaints have been sent to the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO) about the tender’s fairness.

    - Advertisement -

    Critics say public tenders should be fair and open. Specifications should allow all eligible manufacturers to bid, ensuring competition and saving public money. However, this tender seems biased. It specifically mentions Samsung A06 (4+64), raising concerns about favoritism.

    Concerns grow as the department avoided a pre-bid meeting, which usually helps clarify queries and ensure fair participation. Skipping this step suggests a lack of transparency.

    - Advertisement -
    Also read:  BJP Leaders Ask District Collector for Kashipuram Village Road Approval

    Despite written complaints from manufacturers, the department stayed silent, which is troubling. Critics argue the tender benefits certain interests rather than the public.

    Two mobile companies have formally asked the CMO to cancel the tender. They demand a transparent process that uses public funds wisely.

    Key issues highlighted include:

    • Brand lock: Naming a specific brand and model excludes other bidders, blocking competition.
    • Unrealistic deadline: A 10-day period for such a large tender limits participation.
    • Non-GeM testing: Accepting samples from companies not on the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) violates norms.
    • Procedural lapse: Missing a Purchase Approval Certificate, replaced by an unsigned Meeting Minutes, raises concerns.
    - Advertisement -
    Rajesh M
    Rajesh Mhttps://www.telanganatribune.com
    Latest News from Hyderabad, Telangana, India & World!

    Follow us

    3,565FansLike
    179FollowersFollow
    1,202FollowersFollow
    965SubscribersSubscribe

    Contribute News

    You can contribute an article to Telangana Tribune by dropping a mail at newsdesk@telanganatribune.com

    Latest stories

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here